Limitation on rights
-
Compulsory treatment under the Mental Health and Wellbeing Act
The MHW Act defines as one of its purposes to ‘restate the law relating to the treatment of persons living with mental illness’. Mental illness is defined at section 4 as ‘a medical condition that is characterised by a significant disturbance of thought, mood, perception or memory’. Compulsory treatment under the MHW Act is discussed in detail in Chapter 8.4: Mental illness.
Supervised treatment under the Disability Act
Supervised treatment orders (STOs) can be made under the D Act where the person has an intellectual disability. Section 3 of the D Act provides the relevant definition:
A “cognitive impairment”, in relation to a person over the age of five years, means the concurrent existence of:
significant sub-average general intellectual functioning; and
significant deficits in adaptive behaviour
each of which became manifest before the age of 18 years.
A STO is an order made by VCAT under section 191 of the D Act.
A STO may be made if:
a person has a cognitive impairment;
the person is living in a place classified as a ‘residential service’ under the D Act;
the person has previously exhibited a pattern of violent or dangerous behaviour causing serious harm to another person or exposing another person to a significant risk of serious harm;
there is a significant risk of serious harm to another person that cannot be substantially reduced by using less restrictive means; and
the services to be provided to the person will be of benefit to the person and substantially reduce the significant risk of serious harm to another person;
the person is unable or unwilling to consent to voluntarily complying with the treatment; and
it is necessary to detain the person to ensure compliance.
These orders only apply to people with an intellectual disability. A STO cannot be made for more than one year but there is no limit to how many STOs can be made. Restrictions under a STO can include requirements that the person be supervised at all times, take certain medications, and participate in offence-related treatment.
-
Many ‘restrictive practices’ are actions that would be illegal in any other circumstance. They include seclusion and physical, chemical, mechanical and environmental restraints. Preventing a person from being with others, medicating them to control their behaviour, physically restraining them, or preventing them from accessing items or areas in their own home are controlling behaviours that are unlawful for other people.
These practices are allowed under various regulatory arrangements, including the National Disability Insurance Scheme (Restrictive Practices and Behaviour Support) Rules 2018 (Cth) and the D Act, but should be used as a last resort, and all such practices should be reported.
If a person is being subjected to restrictive practices, it is important that their rights are being upheld, and appropriate monitoring and reporting is occurring.
For more information contact the Victorian Senior Practitioner, NDIS Commission, or Villamanta Disability Rights Legal Service Inc.
See ‘Contacts’ at the end of this chapter.
-
VCAT can make a guardianship or administration order under the GA Act if a person does not have decision-making capacity in relation to certain matters because of their disability.
Guardianship and administration are discussed in detail in Chapter 8.5: Guardianship and medical treatment.
Limitation on rights
Chapter: 8.1: Understanding disability and the law
Contributor: Philip Grano, Former Principal Lawyer, Office of the Public Advocate; Naomi Anderson, Legal Practice Manager, Villamanta Disability Rights Legal Service
Current as of: 1 September 2024
Law Handbook Page: 702
Next Section: Where disability intersects with other laws
