Family violence intervention orders

29 Jan

TRIGGER WARNING: Please note this chapter (and pages it links to) contains information about family violence that may be triggering to family violence survivors.

Under the FVP Act, any family member experiencing violence may obtain an intervention order.
‘Family member’ is defined in the FVP Act (s 8) and includes a current or former spouse, a domestic partner (see the expanded definition below), a person who has/has had an intimate personal relationship with the respondent (whether or not it is sexual in nature; this includes boyfriend–girlfriend relationships, same-sex relationships, parties involved in a brief sexual relationship, and even close platonic friends), a parent, a child, a relative (including immediate and extended family) and any other person whom the relevant person views as being like a family member in certain prescribed circumstances (s 8(3)).
‘Domestic partner’ is an adult person to whom the person seeking protection is not married but is in a relationship with as a couple, irrespective of their genders and whether or not they are living together (s 9). Paid carers and co-tenants are excluded. ‘Relative’ also covers a wide range of people (s 10).
An intervention order is a fast, inexpensive and easily accessible remedy for a family member who needs immediate short-term, and long-term, protection.
Applications for intervention orders are usually heard in the Magistrates’ Court, unless the sole applicant or sole respondent is under 18 years old.
When the sole applicant or respondent is underage, the application is usually heard in the Children’s Court, which has the same powers as the Magistrates’ Court.
Section 81 of the FVP Act sets out some of the conditions that may be included in a family violence intervention order. An intervention order may:
- prohibit the respondent from committing family violence against the protected person;
- exclude the respondent from the protected person’s residence (called an ‘exclusion condition’);
- restrict a person’s access to any premises and/or a specified area;
- prohibit the respondent from contacting or communicating with the protected person by any means;
- direct the use of specific personal property;
- prohibit publishing – on the internet, by email or other electronic communication – any material about the protected person;
- prohibit the respondent from causing another person to engage in conduct prohibited by the order;
- require the respondent to attend counselling;
- revoke or suspend any licence/permit to carry or use firearms.
If the court decides to make an intervention order, the court must consider whether to include an exclusion condition (s 82). The FVP Act prescribes the circumstances which the court must examine before making an order. There are cross-references to residential tenancy laws and to housing provided by the Victorian Government Department of Families, Fairness and Housing (DFFH).
In addition, there are extra circumstances for the court to consider if the respondent to such an exclusion condition is a child (s 83). Also, the FVP Act sets out procedures for orders relating to personal property (ss 86–88), family law (ss 89–93) and counselling (ss 129, 130).
An intervention order may be:
- interim (for a short period until a final hearing); or
- final (for a longer prescribed period, or for an indefinite period).
An intervention order may also contain exceptions, such as ‘do anything that is permitted by a Family Law Act order, a child protection order, or a written agreement about child arrangements’.
Once an intervention order is made, the affected family member is known as the ‘protected person’.
Interim intervention orders
Under the FVP Act (s 53), an ‘interim intervention order’ can be made by a magistrate who is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that an interim order is necessary (pending a final decision about the application) to:
- ensure the safety of the affected family member;
- preserve any property of the affected family member; or
- protect an affected family member who is a child who has been subjected to family violence committed by the respondent.
Final intervention orders
Under the FVP Act (s 74), a ‘final intervention order’ can be made by a magistrate who is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the respondent has committed family violence against the affected family member and is likely to continue to do so or do so again. This is a more onerous test as the court must be satisfied, according to the civil standard, that there has been family violence in the past and the respondent is likely to commit family violence again.
An application for a family violence intervention order can be made online or can be filed with the registrar at a Magistrates’ Court. See www.mcv.vic.gov.au for the process and list of Magistrates’ Courts. There is no filing fee.
An affected family member can apply for an intervention order in person, or by lodging a written application, or through another person (e.g. a friend, refuge worker or solicitor), or through the police.
One application can be used to cover a parent and their children against the same respondent.
Sometimes an affidavit (i.e. a sworn statement) or a written statement with further details of the alleged behaviour (known as ‘further and better particulars’) is filed too.

Police officers are increasingly more active and interventionist in family violence cases. Victoria Police operate under two frameworks: Policing Harm, Upholding the Right: Victoria Police strategy for family violence, sexual offences and child abuse 2018–2023 and the important updated Code of Practice for the Investigation of Family Violence, 4th edn, version 2, 2022 (‘Code of Practice’). Through Operation Enforceable, Victoria Police regularly targets family violence offenders.
Police can apply for an intervention order on behalf of a family member experiencing violence – even without the consent of the affected family member. Police now act as applicants (i.e. the person seeking the intervention order) in over 75 per cent of all cases.
One of the benefits of a police officer acting as an applicant is that police officers can apply for interim intervention orders by telephone outside normal court hours. This is useful in emergency situations, at night, during weekends, or in isolated country areas where the nearest courthouse is far away.
Police also have ‘holding powers’ where a police officer can apprehend and detain an adult for six hours (or 10 hours if extended by a court) in order to apply for and/or serve an intervention order.
In addition, police officers of the rank of sergeant and above have the power to issue a ‘family violence safety notice’ to ensure the safety of a family member, or to preserve property, or to protect a child. The police cannot issue a notice against a person under 18 years old. A safety notice can be issued at any time and lasts up to the first ‘mention’ date, which is the first date on which the application for an intervention order is listed before the court. The first mention date should be no later than 14 days after the safety notice was served on the respondent. A safety notice has the same effect as an interim intervention order and is a very useful tool for providing immediate protection.
Breaching a safety notice or an intervention order is a criminal offence.
If the affected family member is under 18 years old, the application for an intervention order can be made on their behalf.
An application can be made by:
- a parent;
- any person with a parent’s written consent; or
- a police officer.
However, the child may apply for the order themselves, if they are aged 14–17 years, and with leave of the court. In order to grant leave, the court must be satisfied that the child understands the nature and consequences of an intervention order. Such applications are usually heard in the Children’s Court instead of the Magistrates’ Court.
If the affected family member wants to go to the police, it is best to seek legal advice first to discuss all the options, especially as there may be a risk of involvement by child protection in DFFH.
Before making a final intervention order, a court must consider whether there are any children who are family members of the affected family member, or of the respondent, who have been subjected to family violence committed by the respondent. In such a case, the court may grant an intervention order on its own initiative to include the child (FVP Act s 77).

Usually, when the police or a family member experiencing family violence files an application for an intervention order, the Magistrates’ Court registrar issues a summons that is served personally on the respondent before the hearing date. Service is effected by police officers working close to where the respondent lives.
However, if an applicant alleges that there has been an assault or assault has been threatened – and the registrar is satisfied that the family member’s personal safety or property would be seriously threatened if the respondent is not apprehended and brought into custody – a warrant can be issued for the apprehension of the respondent. The applicant must then seek an intervention order in the same way.
It is state-wide police policy that proceedings brought by police should be initiated by an application and warrant where, after a risk assessment and investigation, there are concerns for the safety of a family member or where criminal offences are involved. This policy is part of the Victoria Police’s Code of Practice.
Does the respondent have to attend court?
Intervention orders can be made ex parte (i.e. without the respondent being present). In urgent cases, an interim intervention order can be made ex parte if the court is satisfied that it is necessary to ensure the safety of the affected family member or to preserve their property. A final intervention order can be made ex parte if the respondent cannot be located or chooses not to attend once served.
In intervention order proceedings in court, evidence is mostly given in person by the applicant, the respondent and any relevant witnesses.
The court may require the applicant and the respondent to provide ‘further and better particulars’ about the facts and allegations that will be put forward in support of, or in response to, an application for an intervention order. The court may also require the names of any witnesses.
The FVP Act (ss 70–72) has unique provisions about cross-examining parties who are not represented by lawyers. If the applicant and/or the respondent does not have legal representation, then the Magistrates’ Court must order Victoria Legal Aid to offer funding for separate lawyers to appear for the applicant and/or the respondent just for the purposes of cross-examination. If the applicant and/or the respondent rejects the offer of legal representation, then certain cross-examination is not permitted.
It is recommended that you seek legal advice and have legal representation for intervention order court proceedings, especially when the police are not involved. Duty lawyers are available in many Magistrates’ Courts.
An intervention order on its own does not necessarily stop or prevent contact with any children. If a court makes an intervention order, it has the power to revive, vary, discharge or suspend orders made about any relevant children under the FL Act. The court has the power to amend FL Act orders to make them consistent with the intervention order. Also, even if there are no FL Act orders in relation to a child, the court can include conditions in the intervention order about contact with that child.
There is often misunderstanding about the interaction between family violence intervention orders and family law parenting orders, and so it is important to obtain legal advice.
A respondent to an intervention order may still apply for parenting orders but the intervention order and any surrounding circumstances will be taken into account when the court determines the best interests of the child under section 60CC of the FL Act.
If a parenting order already exists about, for example, spending time with the children, the Magistrates’ Court has the power to vary the existing parenting order, so it does not conflict with an intervention order (e.g. where the children are to be collected or dropped off). This power exists under section 68R of the FL Act and can be exercised at the same time as making an intervention order under the FVP Act.
If a parenting order for spending time with children is inconsistent with an intervention order, then the parenting order prevails and the intervention order is invalid to the extent of the inconsistency (FL Act s 68Q). If there is an inconsistency, it is a good idea to vary the parenting order to avoid problems. Obtaining legal advice is recommended.
An intervention order may remain in force indefinitely or for any specified period. Most commonly, intervention orders last for one to two years. If the respondent is a child, the final intervention order must not remain in force for more than 12 months unless there are exceptional circumstances (FVP Act ss 97–99). In certain limited cases – such as where service has not been effected or in ‘exceptional circumstances’ – a respondent to a final order may seek a rehearing (FVP Act s 122).
However, if either party seeks to challenge any aspect of a final intervention order, both the applicant and the respondent can appeal; such appeals are usually heard in the County Court. If the appeal involves a question of law rather than the facts and merits of a particular case, then it will be heard in the Supreme Court. The procedure for appeals is set out in the FVP Act.
A power of arrest without warrant automatically attaches to an intervention order for the duration of the order. This authorises state police officers to arrest and detain the respondent if they believe on reasonable grounds that the respondent has contravened the order.
Unlike an injunction under the FL Act, a contravention or breach of an intervention order is a criminal offence (FVP Act s 123) for which the police should prosecute. If the court is satisfied under the criminal standard of proof (i.e. ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’) that there has been a breach, it may impose a maximum fine of 240 penalty units (pu) (see ‘A note about penalty units’ at the start of this book) and/or imprisonment for up to two years. (See DPP v Cormick [2023] VSCA 186 about the interpretation of s 123.)
‘Persistent’ contraventions (as defined in s 125A FVP Act) attract higher maximum penalties, namely up to 600 pu and/or imprisonment for up to five years. As in other summary crime matters, other prescribed penalties are available (see Chapter 1.3: Sentencing in the Magistrates’ Court).
The Victorian Sentencing Advisory Council regularly publishes reports about sentencing practices for the contravention of family violence intervention orders and safety notices, and about recidivism (reoffending) in contravention cases (see www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au).
Applications can be made to vary, revoke or extend family violence intervention orders (see FVP Act ss 108–113). It is important to note that intervention orders cannot be automatically extended once the period has expired. Applications seeking intervention order extensions must be filed at a Magistrates’ Court before the order expires. If the intervention order has expired, then a new application needs to be filed.
If a court intends to make a family violence intervention order, it must ask if the respondent holds a firearms licence, has a weapons exemption (e.g. for sport) or has a weapons approval (e.g. to sell weapons).
Once the court makes an interim or final intervention order, the respondent becomes a ‘prohibited person’ under section 3 of the Firearms Act 1996 (Vic) (‘Firearms Act’) and section 3 of the Control of Weapons Act 1990 (Vic). If the order is an interim order, it can include a condition that the licence, exemption or approval is suspended. If the order is a final order, it can include a condition that the licence exemption or approval is cancelled or revoked. Police serve the family violence intervention order on the respondent and may seize any firearms, ammunition and licence documents.
Where a final order has been made, the respondent has three months to apply to the Magistrates’ Court under the Firearms Act (ss 46B–49, 189) to have their status changed to a ‘non-prohibited person’. Otherwise, the respondent remains a prohibited person for the duration of the final order, plus a further five years.
The protected family member who took out the family violence intervention order is informed of the section 189 application and is interviewed by Victoria Police to find out if and why they object to the perpetrator retaining or obtaining a firearms licence. Any evidence relating to previous violence involving firearms or related threats needs to be provided to the police. In many cases the police will oppose the application on behalf of the protected person. If not, the protected person can oppose the application and the assistance of a lawyer is recommended.
Generally, it is an offence to publish, or cause to be published, details about intervention order proceedings that may identify the parties or witnesses or locality involved (FVP Act ss 166–168).
One exception is if the court reasonably considers it is in the public interest and it is just in the circumstances to allow publication (FVP Act s 169). Another exception to this anti-publication provision is where you can ‘name and shame’ offenders if they contravene an intervention order or safety notice. There are strict requirements for relying on these exceptions and it is essential to seek legal advice before doing so (see Chapter 2.3 Legal services that can help).
The National Domestic Violence Order Scheme covers all Australian states and territories, and New Zealand.
All intervention orders issued in Victoria since 25 November 2017 are automatically recognised as ‘national domestic violence orders’ and are enforceable anywhere in Australia. Victorian intervention orders no longer need to be registered in other states and territories to be enforceable outside Victoria.
Breaching or contravening a national domestic violence order attracts the penalties of the state or territory in which the order was breached (e.g. if a Victorian intervention order is breached in New South Wales, it is enforceable under New South Wales law, and not under the FVP Act).
New Zealand protection orders are recognised and are enforceable in Victoria, and vice versa.